70's Disco!--I Love America-Patrick Juvet
Due to a glitch in Blogger, I had to repost the title to include comments which follow:
Labels: 70's Disco, EuroDisco, I Love America, Patrick Juvet, the Hustle
Eclectic Research & Informed Opinion about.. Atheism, Cats, Chess, Economics, Finance, Futures, History, Humor, Nostalgia, Philosophy, Politics, Psychiatry, Science, 70's Disco, Sociology, Stock & Option Trading, Tennis....
Due to a glitch in Blogger, I had to repost the title to include comments which follow:
Labels: 70's Disco, EuroDisco, I Love America, Patrick Juvet, the Hustle
Labels: 70's Disco, EuroDisco, I Love America, Patrick Juvet, the Hustle
Barack Obama to be re-elected President in 2012 = 65.1% @Intrade
Labels: 2012 Presidential election, Barack Obama, Intrade Prediction maket, Mitt Romney
Labels: arthritis, exercise, NYC Parks Foundation, Seniors, tennis, yoga
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”Curtesy of http://thinkexist.com/quotation/-if_you_tell_a_lie_big_enough_and_keep_repeating/345877.html **The Sturmabteilung Ernst Rohm picture & above definition Curtesy of Wikipedia-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownshirts |
Labels: Adolf Hitler, Brownshirts, Ernst Rohm, John Dean, Joseph Goebbels, Naziism, republic, Richard Nixon, Tea Party, Watergate
Image courtesy of www.inewscatcher.com/ timages/b8a5c2dbad5e0727..
Labels: Serena Cuts Foot, Serena Williams, Washington Kastles, WTT
Lust is Easy...
Per your request, the following is an explanation as to why I am closing my Chase Checking Account.
And rather than lending these funds to small businesses in an attempt to help revive a moribund economy, commercial banks like Chase are choking off credit by raising rates & tightening lending standards.
And this after gorging yourselves at the taxpayer trough of unlimited "Fed favors" during the financial meltdown.
Uhmmm..Go get the money from Mr. Bernanke. He'll just print or borrow it. He is an associate of Tony Soprano. You see, he likes to confiscate the income of Seniors like me, too. Then he gives it to you, Mr. Dimon. It's the "American way".
********************************************************************************
Coming soon: The ultimate "thermonuclear" option Seniors can employ vs. the Banks, Credit Card Companies & Health Care Providers--BANKRUPTCY. How it actually IMPROVES rather than DAMAGES your credit and why. And what does it mean to be "Judgment-Proof"?
For an in-depth discussion of U.S. bank profits, please follow this link:
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/apr2009/bank-a18.shtml
*******************************************************************************************
DISCLAIMER:MrKen is NOT a registered financial advisor & any opinions, suggestions or strategies explained are based on his own experiences and knowledge. Readers of this blog should consult their own financial advisors, accountants and/or brokers before taking any action explicitly or implicitly recommended or recounted by this writer.
********************************************************************************************
Labels: 10 Year Treasury Bond, Ben Bernanke, Capital One Bank, Citigroup, Fed Discount Window, fed funds, financial reform legislation, J.P. Morgan Chase, RICO, Tony Soprano, U.S. Bank Profits
This former registered Democrat views both political parties as hopelessly corrupt. The "Yes, We Can" Administration is anything but. I suggest to the dwindling supporters of this "No We Can't & We Won't" Administration, that they view the first part of "The Daily Show" (6/15) with Jon Stewart---
Labels: Afghanistan, Bush Administration, Guantanamo Bay, Gulf of Mexico, interrogations, war on terror
Despite AARP's advocacy of this past year's putative "universal health care" bill, and uninformed--or purposely misleading--articles by sources that should know better; e.g., the New York Times-- seniors will most certainly pay a disproportionate price for this sell out to the insurance industry.
Labels: 2010 Health Care Legislation, AARP, Medicare Payments Slashed by 21%, See Out to Insurance Companies, Seniors
Labels: 2009 U.S. Tennis Open, foot fault, ITF, Kim Clijsters, Serena Williams, USTA
Labels: 2010 Australian Open Women's Final, Carlos Rodriguez, Justine Henin, Kim Clijsters, Nadia Petrova, Serena Williams
Henin beat second-seeded Nadia Petrova of Russia 7-5, 7-5 in the first round of the Brisbane International on Monday, the former No. 1’s first official tour match since announcing her comeback in September.
“I feel better today than when I retired, that’s for sure,” Henin said. “Better emotionally, mentally. Better with myself, and that makes a big difference.”
She is preparing to make her return to Grand Slam action at the Australian Open, which starts Jan. 18.
Henin abruptly left the tour in May 2008 after spending a total of 117 weeks at No. 1, winning seven major championships, an Olympic gold medal and 41 WTA titles overall. Now she is back, perhaps inspired by another Belgian, Kim Clijsters, who returned to the tour after about two years away and promptly won last year’s U.S. Open.
The 27-year-old Henin said she might be in stronger physical shape than she was 20 months ago. She certainly felt better psychologically after Monday’s victory, which followed exhibition wins last month, including one over Petrova.
'I’ve been waiting for this moment for so long,” Henin said. “At the beginning, everything seemed very big: the stadium, all the people. I’m not used to it anymore.'...
'...Grand Slam champions and former No. 1 players Venus Williams and Maria Sharapova—taking part in an exhibition event in Hong Kong—both predicted Henin will once again be a force.
“She was a great champion before,” Williams said. “She can keep on playing great tennis.”
Sharapova called Henin’s return good for the women’s tour.'...
For the full story, please follow this link:
http://sports.yahoo.com/ten/news?slug=ap-brisbane&prov=ap&type=lgns
As far as I know, Serena Williams had nothing to say about Henin's return. Henin crushed her in the 2007 U.S. Open, 7-6 (3), 6-1, and was ranked #1 in the world for over 12 months. Williams only offers gratuitous praise to players whom she crushes, but because she is a classless sore loser (see my previous post), S. Williams always finds excuses for her poor play when she loses.--She is never outplayed, in her mind; her opponent was lucky (2007 aforementioned loss to Henin), she was treated unfairly (the "foot fault" controversy), blah, blah, blah...
It would be terrific for the WTA if Justine can quickly get into top form, as Kim Clijsters did at the U.S. Open. I'm looking forward to a Henin-Clijsters match, as well as a renewed competition with the Williams' sisters.
Labels: 2010 Brisbane International, Justine Henin, Kim Clijsters, Maria Sharapova, Nadia Petrova, Serena Williams, Venus Williams, WTA
MrKen will turn 65 next year, and has been researching articles on Medicare in an attempt to ascertain whether it's worthwhile or not to sign up. On balance, the Medicare system may not represent an especially good value for seniors, both on the issues of access to certain tests and treatment options--not to mention the pressing issue of economic viability--a nice way to say it is careening towards insolvency.
The first rule reads:
“Individuals entitled to monthly benefits which confer eligibility for HI may not waive HI entitlement. The only way to avoid HI Entitlement is through withdrawal of the monthly benefit application. Withdrawal requires repayment of all Retirement, Survivors, Disability Insurance (RSDI) and HI benefit payments.”
The second rule reads:
“To withdraw from the HI program, an individual must submit a written request for withdrawal and must refund any HI benefits paid on his/her behalf … An individual who filed an application for both monthly benefits and HI may:
• Withdraw the claim for monthly benefits without jeopardizing HI entitlement; or
• Withdraw the claim for both monthly benefits and HI. The individual may not elect to withdraw only the HI claim.”
Notice this Clinton rule change allows you to yield your SS benefits and keep Medicare, but you may not keep your SS retirement checks and yield your Medicare enrollment.
To read the rest of the article, go to...
Still skeptical? No, I have never heard of the "floppingaces" website either. But 'The Wall Street Journal.com' in an editorial dated 10/28/08 wrote:
The suit comes courtesy of Kent Masterson Brown, a lawyer who has previously tangled with the government over Medicare benefits. Mr. Brown represents three plaintiffs who are suing the federal government to be allowed to opt out of Medicare without losing their Social Security benefits.
Amazingly, this is not currently allowed. While the Social Security law does not require participants to accept Medicare, and the Medicare law does not require participants to accept Social Security, the Clinton Administration in 1993 tied the programs together. Under that policy, any senior who withdraws from Medicare also loses Social Security benefits.
For the rest of the article, please follow this link: http://online.wsj.com/articleSB122506801638770679.html
And a follow up Journal article on 10/4/09:
'...Last week, Washington D.C. District Judge Rosemary Collyer handed a victory to three plaintiffs seeking that right. President Obama's Department of Health and Human Services had sought to dismiss the suit challenging so-called POMS rules that say seniors who withdraw from Medicare Part A must also surrender their Social Security benefits. (Part A covers hospital and outpatient services.) The judge ruled the plaintiffs have standing to contest their claim on the merits.
POMS were imposed in 1993 during the Clinton Administration and set forth rules that aren't in the statute or regulations governing Medicare. The three plaintiffs—Brian Hall, John Kraus and former U.S. House Majority Leader Richard Armey—all had health-care plans they preferred to the coverage they were compelled to receive through Medicare.
In her ruling this week, the judge said that "neither the statute nor the regulation specifies that Plaintiffs must withdraw from Social Security and repay retirement benefits in order to withdraw from Medicare." Article I of the Constitution gives Congress sole power to legislate—so when agency rules conflict with federal statute, the statute takes precedence.
The Obama Administration argued that the case should be dismissed because the plaintiffs had not exhausted the available administrative remedies for challenging POMS. Judge Collyer rejected that notion, noting that one plaintiff had sought an administrative hearing but "received no response from the SSA for approximately three years." Exhaustion of remedies was therefore "futile." A three-year wait is precisely the kind of bureaucratic hassle, or deliberate stonewalling, that government is famous for...
The response of the Obama Administration to this lawsuit is revealing about its principles, as opposed to its rhetoric. President Obama says his plan for a "public option" wouldn't be coercive, saying that "If you like your health-care plan, you keep your health-care plan. Nobody is going to force you to leave your health-care plan." But here is a case where federal bureaucrats are using their power to force Medicare on seniors. Let's hope the courts restore a genuine right to choose....(emphases MrKen)
Link to full story: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704471504574446831381142174.html#articleTabs%3Darticle
Apparently SSA conjured the requirement to sign up for part A of Medicare out of thin air "without public notice and comment."
*******************************************
MrKen is growing increasingly frustrated and alarmed with the Obama Administration. Along with comedian & libertarian Bill Maher, I really cannot see very much difference between Bush & Obama's increasingly reactionary policies. Are the aforementioned the kind of "choices" we can expect from the Administration's so-called Universal Health Care?
And no thoughtful person can seriously expect another huge new government program to actually save money over the next ten years. According to the WSJ, Medicare is now 37 times more costly (taking into account inflation) than at its inception. And it is nearly bankrupt. Considering the looming trillion dollar plus deficits on the horizon due to massive overspending and yet another expensive, open-ended military adventure -Afganistan- where exactly will the money come from? The same Times editorial optimistically opines:
...The Obama administration and Congressional leaders are hoping to save hundreds of billions of dollars by slowing the growth of spending in the vast and inefficient Medicare system that serves 45 million older and disabled Americans. The savings would be used to help offset the costs of covering tens of millions of uninsured people. (italics mine)
Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/27/opinion/27sun1.html/
As I noted, where will the money come from?
********************************************
On Oct. 13, lead counsel for the plaintiffs, Kent Masterson Brown, discussed the lawsuit and recent judicial rulings re Hall v Sebelius at a Capitol House Briefing. Also speaking was Michael F. Cannon, Director of Health Policy Studies, Cato Institute, and co-author of Healthy Competition: What's Holding Back Health Care and How to Free It.
How Government "Competes": Grab Arm, Twist Cato Institute: Capitol Hill BriefingLabels: Cato Institute, Hall v Sibelius, ibelius, Kent Masterson Brown, Medicare Part A, Social Security
Viewers please note: a complete discussion of this controversial default is contained in post below (after Cats that look like Hitler). The original link to the video in that post is broken & cannot be deleted.
Labels: 2009 U.S. Open, foot fault, Kim Clijsters, Serena Williams, women's semifinal
chaplin (owned by vikki) (3834)
Labels: Adolf Hitler, cat, cats that look like Hitler, Kitler